Case study · photovoltaic roof
A roof photo, or a survey that actually serves ?
Plenty of people can fly a drone over a roof. What changes the outcome is knowing what you are looking at. Here, the state of the panels was not the point — most of what mattered was happening around them.
Fall protection
No guardrail on the parapet, no visible lifeline, and panels laid right to the edge. Every intervention — cleaning, swapping an inverter, checking torque — happens at the edge of the drop, on a membrane the rain makes slippery.
Walkways and access
No dedicated walkway. To reach a middle row you walk between the modules, on the waterproofing, stepping over cables. The work position is reachable ; the route to it is not.
DC cabling
A harness resting on the bitumen along the whole row, unfixed in places. Under UV and abrasion, a sheath eventually gives — and a DC insulation fault does not switch off the way an AC circuit does.
Openings and smoke vents
An unguarded open metal frame, and smoke vents with panels less than a metre away. Two separate matters : falling through the opening, and smoke ventilation that has to open fully.
Interface with the waterproofing
Feet and rails sit directly on the membrane, and the cables pass through it. Those details, not the modules, decide how long the roof lasts — and they are the most expensive to put right once the array is down.
What the photo does not settle
Actual ballast in edge and corner zones, the wind-load calculation, cable cross-sections, earthing, commissioning records. The image shows what is visible ; compliance is read in the file. The survey tells you which documents to ask for.
What is delivered besides the images
A reading, not a generated report. Findings are marked on the shots themselves, at the exact spot where they read, with the enlargement taken from the original photo.
A hierarchy. What puts people at risk first, what damages the installation next, what costs yield last. The three are not handled at the same pace, nor by the same trades.
Follow-ups you can act on. The points to be closed out, the documents to request from the installer, and what belongs to a qualified professional rather than to a flight. The drone observes ; it does not sign off an installation.
Roof covering and metalwork
The whole slope, then the slate
The overview is not there to conclude: it is there to say where to look closer. Both scales come from the same flight, seconds apart.
Thermography
The thermal camera opens nothing : it says where to open
The images below are raw readings, with no temperature attached. A quantitative survey is another thing : it demands a sufficient temperature difference, a chosen hour, a stated emissivity — and the calibration that goes with it.
Chimney stacks
The highest element, and the least looked at
From the ground you see nothing of the crown. From a ladder leant against it, you see only one cheek. From straight above, it is all in one plane — capping slabs, flues, joints and flashings.
Heritage and steeples
Structures you cannot otherwise reach
On a steeple, the scaffolding often costs more than the survey it enables. The flight gives the first reading — and sometimes that is enough to decide.
Masts and technical sites
Inspecting without climbing mostly changes the frequency
A climb has to be planned, secured and justified. A flight, far less so. You can look twice a year rather than only when work is due.
A mission
What happens before and after the images
The shots on this page are the visible part. Most of the work is being able to take off on that day, at that hour, in that place.
Feasibility first
Geozones active in the target slot, the ceiling that actually applies, nature reserves, hour-by-hour weather. That is exactly what botic does — the tool grew out of these flights.
The flight
One overview pass, then the detail points one by one. Both scales come out of the same visit : coming back costs a second trip and a second weather window.
The sort
Many images, few useful views. What is delivered is sorted, oriented and named — not a copied memory card.
The reporting
Findings are marked on the image itself, with the enlargement taken from the original shot. What is shown is what was photographed.
Equipment
What these shots do not show yet
All of them predate the Matrice 4TD, which has since arrived. Three things change — and this page will change with them, mission by mission. A stated capability is not a shot : until there is an image, it stays inside this box.
Measurement, not just colour
Radiometric thermal sensor 640 × 512 : every pixel carries a temperature. The three readings above say “it is warmer here” ; the next ones will say by how much.
The detail without getting closer
Three focal lengths up to 168 mm, 112× hybrid zoom, and a laser rangefinder. Read a nameplate, or dimension a height, from the distance you are already at.
The same framing, two months later
IP55 and Dock 3 compatibility : a flight plan replayed identically. Two comparable images beat two visits that are not.
The four fields of work and the full equipment sheet : Services.
Limits
What these images do not replace
A stated limit beats an assumed coverage — on this page as on the rest of the site.
An image shows a surface, not what lies beneath it
The drone does not probe, dismantle, lift a slate or measure any thickness. It records the apparent state at the moment of the shot, in that moment's light. A damp roof structure under an intact covering cannot be seen from the sky.
The infrared readings shown here are qualitative : they locate differences, they do not quantify them. A usable measurement assumes a protocol — indoor/outdoor temperature difference, no recent direct sun, stated emissivity, calibrated equipment.
The diagnosis remains the work of a qualified professional : roofer, engineer, expert. These images serve to have them look in the right place, and sometimes to spare them the climb.